Livestock and pets - Wildlife removal Wildlife removal

Lethal control

Lethal control may be selectively targeting specific individuals that are considered to pose a higher threat to livestock and pets than the average individual in the population. In this case it could be undertaken through selective trapping, poisoning, or hunting. Alternatively, lethal control may be unselective and target any individual in a population with unselective trapping, poisoning, or hunting. The largest decrease in risk of livestock predation has been found in studies where selective removal has been used (Blejwas et al, Harper et al.) whereas unselective removal had a smaller effect (Bradley et al, Wagner and Conover). The effect of lethal control to prevent recurring attacks on livestock is largest if the intervention is used immediately after a first attack, whereas the effect is severely reduced after 7 days and no effect remained if the intervention occurred 14 days after the first predation event (Bradley et al).

Referenced papers
Bradley, E. H., Robinson, H. S., Bangs, E. E., Kunkel, K., Jimenez, M.D., Gude, J. A. and Grimm, T. 2015. Effects of wolf removal on livestock depredation recurrence and wolf recovery in Montana, Idaho, and Wyoming. Journal of Wildlife Management, 79, 1337-1346.
The study investigate the effect of wolf removal on recurring predation events. Full pack removal reduced the risk of recurring predation events more than did partial pack removal. Where full pack removal was used recurring events involved neighbouring packs. Partial removal was most effective within 7 days of the first predation event, after 14 days no effect remained.

Blejwas, K. M., Sacks, B. N., Jaeger, M. M. and McCullough, D. R. 2002. The effectiveness of selective removal of breeding coyotes in reducing sheep predation. Journal of Wildlife Management, 66, 451-462.
Selective removal of breeding coyotes reduced lamb predation, and the effect approximated the time for a replacement pair of coyotes to establish. Selective removal was more effective than non-selective removal.

Harper, E. K., Paul, W. J., Mech, L. D. and Weisberg, S. 2008. Effectiveness of lethal, directed wolf-depredation control in Minnesota. Journal of Wildlife Management, 72, 778-784.
Lethal control of adult male wolves reduced recurring depredation events, and lethal control in sheep farms were effective. Trapping attempts reduced predation risk also if trapping was unsuccessful, suggesting human activity may deter predation.

Wagner, K. K. and Conover, M. R. 1999. Effect of preventive coyote hunting on sheep losses to coyote predation. Journal of Wildlife Management, 63, 606-612.
Winter aerial hunting of coyotes reduced lamb losses in treated pastures in comparison to untreated pastures. Treatment increased the annual outtake of coyotes in the treated areas and did not replace summer coyote control.